Difference between revisions of "Loss of H.M.S. Victoria"

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Made Changes.)
Line 1: Line 1:
On June 22nd, 1893, the Mediterranean fleet lay off Beirut.  The Commander-in-Chief,' Vice-Admiral Sir [[George Tryon]], K.C.B., flew his flag in the battleship ''Victoria''; the second in command,
+
Captain [[John William Brackenbury|Brackenbury]] wrote to Admiral [[Geoffrey Thomas Phipps Hornby|Sir Geoffrey Hornby]] on 23 June that he believed Markham to be "absolutely blameless".<ref>Letter of 23 June, 1893.  National Maritime Museum. Hornby Papers. PHI/120D.Quoted in Gordon.  ''Rules of the Game''.  p. 653.</ref>  He later wrote to his wife that "the fault was entirely the commander-in-chief's as we were all obeying his orders.<ref>National Maritime Museum.  Brackenbury Papers.  BCK/13/15B.  Quoted in Gordon.  ''Rules of the Game''. p. 653.</ref>
Rear-Admiral [[Albert Hastings Markham]], flew his in the battleship ''Camperdown'', his proper flagship, the ''Trafalgar'', being under repair at Malta.  
 
  
At 10 A.M. the fleet weighed and left for Tripoli, another Syrian port. Soon after 2 P.M. Tryon sent for Staff-Commander [[Thomas Hawkins Smith]], who, when he entered the Vice-Admiral's cabin,
+
Markham later wrote to Noel, "I cannot permit your sneer at the ability of Captain Johnstone to pass unchallenged … I have the greatest confidence in his skill and ability to handle his ship and the utmost faith in his prudence and loyalty."<ref>National Maritime MuseumNoel PapersNOE/1AQuoted in Gordon''Rules of the Game''.  p. 654.</ref>
found Captain the Hon. [[Maurice Archibald Bourke]], of the flagship, already there.  Tryon said that, in order to bring the fleet into suitable formation for anchoring as he intended, he would form it into two divisions in line ahead, and that, when it should be far enough past the line of bearings for anchoring, he would invert the course of the columns by turning inwards 16 points, leaders together, the rest in successionHe also said that the distance between the columns prior to the inception of this manœuvre should be six cables (1200 yards)It was remarked that, in such a case, the minimum distance between the columns should be eight cables (1600 yards) ; whereupon the Vice-Admiral said: "Yes : it shall be eight cables." Soon afterwards, however, signals were made in the usual manner for the fleet to form columns of divisions in line ahead, the columns to be disposed abeam to port, and to be six cables apartThe Staff-Commander, noticing that the distance was six cables, went to the Flag-Lieutenant, Lord Gillford, and asked him whether there was not a mistake; and, being shown the order for six cables in Tryon's handwriting, he asked Lord Gillford to make sure before hauling the signal downThe Flag-Lieutenant went to the Vice-Admiral, but was told: "Keep the six cables up."
 
  
At 3.27 P.M. the signal to invert the columns by altering course 16 points inwards was hoistedAt that time the fleet was steaming east by north in two columns, the starboard (1st division) or right hand one of which was led by the ''Victoria'', and the port (2nd division), or left hand one, by the ''Camperdown'',  those ships being abreast of one another and 1200 yards asunderThe speed was 8.8 knots. The signals hoisted on Tryon's orders were;
+
On 13 August Custance wrote to Noel, "Colomb's letter was most unfortunate and I am extremely sorry that it should have been written. The view which he wished to put forward might very well have been stated without making it appear as a personal attack on Sir G Tryon … It will make no end of bad blood."<ref>Letter of 13 August, 1893. Quoted in Gordon.  ''Rules of the Game''.  p. 655.</ref>
  
-
+
==Footnotes==
 +
{{reflist}}
  
{|-
+
==Bibliography==
| SECOND DIVISION || FIRST DIVISION
+
{{refbegin}}
|-
+
*{{BibGordonRules2005}}
| 16 POINTS TO STARBOARD || 16 POINTS TO PORT
+
{{refend}}
|-
 
| IN SUCCESSION || IN SUCCESSION
 
|-
 
| PRESERVING THE ORDER OF THE FLEET. || PRESERVING THE ORDER OF THE FLEET.
 
|}
 
 
 
There was nothing in the signals about leaders turning together.  The moment for the leaders to begin the evolution in such a case is indicated by the hauling down of the signals. But before the
 
signals can be hauled down they have to be repeated by the other ships and acknowledged.  Acknowledgment by the leader of the second division (the ''Camperdown'') was on this occasion delayed,
 
owing, as was stated subsequently, to the fact that Rear-Admiral Markham suspected that there must be some mistake, and ordered his Flag-Lieutenant to make an enquiry on the subject by
 
semaphore. Before the semaphore signal was made, the Commander-in-Chief signalled to ask what the Rear-Admiral was waiting for; Markham, then jumping to the conclusion that something other than what he had at first imagined must be intended, and placing, as he stated afterwards, implicit confidence in Tryon, ordered the signal to be acknowledged in the ordinary way. That
 
acknowledgment, of course, meant that the signal was comprehended, and that it could and would be acted upon when the proper moment should arrive.  An instant later, at 3.31 P.M., the ''Victoria's'' two signals were hauled down simultaneously.  This indicated that the execution of the two manoeuvres was to begin at once, and simultaneously.  Accordingly, the helms of the two flagships were put over, and the great vessels began to turn inwards, and towards one another.  Tryon stood on the top of the ''Victoria's'' chart-house, and watched.
 
 
 
Staff-Commander Smith, who was by his chief's side then and until the end, says: "As the two ships (''Victoria'' and ''Camperdown'') neared one another, the port engine of the ''Victoria'' was reversed, and, when about 10 points round, both engines were put "full speed astern," these directions being given by the Commander-in-Chief.  The two ships rapidly neared one another, and the ''Victoria'', being turned in a smaller circle than the ''Camperdown'', was slightly in advance of the latter, so that the stem of the ''Camperdown'' struck the ''Victoria'' on the starboard bow, about ten feet abaft the anchor,,
 
at about 3.34 P.M. the angle between the lines of keel of the two ships being about
 
.six points, or 68.
 
" When the collision appeared to be inevitable, the order was given to close watertight
 
doors ; and, as the two ships struck, the order was given,
 
' out collision-mat.'
 
" The Camperdown backed astern ; and exertions were made to get the collisionmat
 
over the hole ; but the ship settled so quickly by the head that this could not be
 
VOL. VII. 2 E
 
418 MILITARY HISTORY OF THE ROYAL NAVY, 1857-1900.
 
done. In the meantime (the Captain having left the top of the chart-house by order
 
of the Commander-in-Chief to see about the water-tight doors) it was thought that
 
the ship, being struck so far forward, would keep afloat for a considerable time ; and,
 
being then in deep water (70 to 80 fathoms), it was considered desirable to steer for
 
shallow water the nearest part of the 5-fathom line bearing about south, distant
 
4i miles. The ship's head was turned in that direction, by going astern with the
 
port engine, and ahead with the starboard, so as to clear the Nile,
 
1 the helm being
 
still hard a-starboard. As soon as the ship's head was pointed clear of the Nile, both
 
engines were put ahead,
 
2 and the revolution telegraph put to 38 revolutions, or 7 knots."
 
The collision-mat could not be got over the hole. Tryon, therefore,
 
had to content himself with ordering all the apertures on the
 
low-lying forward deck to be closed ; and men were busily engaged
 
upon that work until, the water rising to their waists, they had
 
to be called in. In the interval the Victoria's bows sank steadily
 
deeper and deeper, while the ship took a list to starboard.
 
" At this time (immediately after the engines had been put
 
' ahead '), the Commander-
 
in-Chief remarked to the Staff-Commander, ' I think she is going.' The latter
 
replied,
 
'
 
Yes, sir ; I think she is.' The Commander-in-Chief then ordered the signal
 
to be made ' send boats '
 
;
 
3
 
and, turning round to give these orders to the signalmen,
 
who were on the fore-bridge, abaft the funnels, he saw one of the Midshipmen
 
standing near the standard compass, and said to him, 'Don't stop there, youngster :
 
go to a boat.' These were probably his last words, for, a few moments after this, the
 
ship gave a heavy lurch to starboard, and then turned over almost instantaneously . . ."
 
Staff-Commander Smith went down with Tryon, but was subsequently
 
saved. His watch had stopped at 3h. 44m. 30s. ; so that,
 
in all probability, not more than about ten minutes elapsed between
 
the moment of the collision and that of the Victoria's disappearance.
 
During that time, both Smith and Lord Gillford heard the Commander-
 
in-Chief say,
 
"
 
It is entirely my fault." Tryon met his fate
 
calmly and bravely, and, after the ship turned over, was never
 
seen again.
 
A court-martial to try the surviving officers and men of the
 
Victoria assembled in the Hibernia, at Malta, on July 17th, and
 
sat until July '27th, Admiral Sir Michael Culme-Seymour presiding,
 
and Captain Alfred Leigh Winsloe acting as prosecutor. Owing to
 
the peculiarities of naval court-martial procedure, Bear-Admiral
 
1 The second ship of the first division, commanded by Capt. Gerard Henry Uctred
 
Noel. The second ship of the second division was the Edinburgh, Capt. John William
 
Brackenbury.
 
2 The wisdom of this is questionable, looking to the damaged state of the ship's
 
bows, unless, indeed, the Victoria could not go astern.
 
8 Several ships had previously begun to get out their boats, but Tryon had
 
forbidden the immediate sending of them, probably fearing lest the sinking of the flagship,
 
while boats were close alongside, would add to the extent of the disaster.
 
1893.] LOSS OF THE " VICTORIA." 419
 
Markham, and his Flag-Captain, Charles Johnstone, of the Camperdown,
 
though really on their trial indirectly, enjoyed none of the
 
privileges which are allowed to nominal prisoners. Markham,
 
however, was present, and was permitted to suggest questions
 
which, by consent of the court, were then put to witnesses. The
 
essential part of the finding was as follows :
 
"... the loss of her Majesty's ship Victoria, off Tripoli, on the coast of Syria, on
 
ihe 22nd day of June, 1893, was caused by a collision with her Majesty's ship
 
Camperdown : and it is with the deepest sorrow and regret that the Court further
 
finds that this collision was due to an order given by the then Commander-in-Chief,
 
the late Vice-Admiral Sir George Tryon, to the two divisions in which the fleet was
 
formed to turn sixteen points inwards, leaders first, the others in succession, the
 
columns at that time being only six cables apart.
 
"
 
Secondly : that after the collision had occurred, everything that was possible was
 
done on board her Majesty's ship Victoria, and in the squadron generally, both to save
 
life and to save the Victoria ; and the Court is of opinion that the order given by the
 
late Yice-Admiral Sir George Tryon to 'annul sending boats, but to hold them in
 
readiness,' was, under the circumstances, a wise one.
 
"
 
Thirdly : the Court finds that no blame is attributable to Captain the Hon.
 
Maurice Archibald Bourke, or to any other of the surviving officers and ship's
 
company of her Majesty's ship Victoria, for the loss of that ship, and doth therefoie
 
acquit them accordingly. The Court desires to record its opinion that the discipline
 
and order maintained on board the Victoria to the last by everyone was in the
 
highest degree creditable to all concerned.
 
"
 
Fourthly : the Court feels strongly that although it is much to be regretted that
 
Rear-Admiral Albert Hastings Markham did not carry out his first intention of
 
semaphoring to the Commander-in-Chief his doubt as to the signal, it would be fatal
 
to the best interests of the service to say he was to blame for carrying out the directions
 
of his Commander-in-Chief present in person."
 
Some time afterwards, viz., on October 28th, the Admiralty
 
adopted the rather unusual course of reviewing the proceedings and
 
finding in a Minute, which contained the following paragraph :
 
" Their Lordships concur in the feeling expressed by the Court that it is much to
 
be regretted that Rear-Admiral A. H. Markham did not carry out his first intention
 
of semaphoring to the Commander-in-Chief his doubts as to the signal ; but they deem
 
it necessary to point out that the Rear-Admiral's belief that the Commander-in-Chief
 
would circle round him was not justified by the proper interpretation of the signal.
 
The evidence shows that it was owing to this misconception that the precautions,
 
which mistrust of the order given by the Commander-in-Chief should have prompted,
 
were not at once taken by the Rear-Admiral, and that he did not order Captain
 
..Johnstone to reverse the starboard screw, and to close the watertight doors, until after
 
the ships had turned eight points inwards and were end on." '
 
Before the making of any comments on this most terrible
 
disaster, the rendering of a tribute to the magnificent behaviour
 
of the Victoria's people in their time of peril must be attended to ;
 
1 Parl. Paper (1893), including Procs. of C.M., Admlty. Min., and Report of Dir.
 
..of Nav. Constr.
 
2 E 2
 
420 MILITARY HISTORY OF THE ROYAL NAVY, 1857-1900.
 
for those who survived and those who died behaved equally gloriously.
 
Captain Bourke, in his evidence, said :
 
" There was absolutely no panic, no shouting, no rushing aimlessly about. The
 
officers went quietly to their stations, and everything was prepared, and the men were
 
all in their positions, for hoisting out boats or performing any duty that may have
 
been ordered. . . . The men on the forecastle worked with a will until the water was
 
up to their waists ; and it was only when they were ordered aft that they left their
 
work to fall in on the upper deck. ... In the case of the men working below, I
 
was a witness to their coolness. When the order was passed down for everyone to go
 
on deck, there was no haste or hurry to desert the flat. I can further testify to the
 
men below in the engine-room. In the starboard one, all were in their stations : the
 
engineer officer was there, the artificer, and the stokers. I am sure that those in
 
the port engine-room and the boiler-rooms were equally true to themselves. ... In
 
all the details of'this terrible accident one spot especially stands out, and that is the
 
heroic conduct of those who, to the end, remained below, stolidly yet boldly, at their
 
place of duty. All honour to them especially. The men fallen in on the upper deck
 
also showed the same spirit. . . . When the men were turned about to face the ship's
 
side, it must have passed through the minds of many that to ' look out for one's self
 
'
 
would be the best thing to do. ... This order to turn about was given apparently
 
about a minute before the end ; and I can hear of not one single instance of any man
 
rushing to the side. . . . Not one was found who had not that control over himself
 
which characterises true discipline and order. It has been shown in evidence that no
 
one jumped from the ship until just as she gave the lurch which ended in her
 
capsizing."
 
It was all magnificent. Only typical of the general spirit was
 
the attitude of the Victoria's much-lamented chaplain, the Eev.
 
Samuel Sheppard Oakley Morris, who stood with the ship's
 
company, and, at the last fearful moment, said coolly and bravely,
 
"
 
Steady, men, steady !
 
"
 
The Camperdoion, it should be added, was herself badly damaged,
 
and was at one time thought to be sinking. Happily, she reached
 
port without serious difficulty.
 
1
 
" The court-martial," says FitzGerald,
 
" did not clear up the
 
point which from the first presented itself as an enigma to the minds
 
of all those who knew Sir George Tryon." Vice-Admiral Fitz-
 
Gerald defines that point as being the question, by what mental
 
powers did Sir George arrive "
 
at the conclusion that six cables
 
apart was a safe distance at which two columns of battleships could
 
be turned inwards, or towards one another?
 
"
 
I had the honour of
 
knowing Sir George Tryon, and I must admit that the point, or
 
rather the points, on which light seems to be desirable do not occur
 
to me in that shape at all. I cannot believe that, if Tryon intended
 
to order the manoeuvre which the court-martial supposed him to
 
1 FitzGerald: 'Life of V.-Adm. Sir Geo. Tryon': Naval Annual, 1894: Desps. ;
 
and Parl. Paper.
 
1893.] LOSS OF THE " VICTORIA? 421
 
have ordered, he ever did
 
"
 
arrive at the conclusion
 
"
 
that he could
 
attempt it safely with only six cables' distance between the columns.
 
And since he did undoubtedly order and countenance the attempting
 
of some manoeuvre when only six cables intervened between the
 
columns, I am inclined to suspect that the manoeuvre, as attempted
 
to be carried out, was not the manoeuvre which Tryon intended to
 
be performed.
 
Vice-Admiral FitzGerald himself admits that it cannot be
 
assumed that Tryon purposed to run a risk. Everything that is
 
known of Sir George contradicts that assumption in the most
 
uncompromising manner. Nor can it be supposed that Sir George
 
suddenly went mad. On the other hand, it is on record, not only
 
that Tryon delighted in ordering unexpected and novel manoeuvres,
 
which occasionally seemed dangerous until they were actually put
 
into execution, but also that those of his Captains who knew his
 
methods well were accustomed, when there were two or more ways
 
of accomplishing a thing, to anticipate that the Commander-in-Chief
 
would not choose the most obvious or prosaic way. They were
 
prepared for originality and brilliancy, but they could not admit the
 
possibility that Tryon would expose his ships to needless danger.
 
1
 
Now, what was Tryon's object in inverting his columns ? It
 
was to bring the fleet into position for anchoring off Tripoli, where
 
the ships were to take up their billets in columns of divisions, with
 
a distance of two cables between the ships in column, and a similar
 
distance between the columns themselves. Intimation of this had
 
been made by signal earlier in the afternoon.
 
Tryon, Markham, and every Captain in the fleet knew perfectly
 
well that the average tactical diameter of the ships concerned was
 
nearly four cables, or 800 yards
 
2
 
; in other words, that the basic
 
diameter of the parabola made by any one of the turning ships must
 
be estimated, for practical purposes, at 800 yards. This being so,
 
the heads of the two columns, being but 1200 yards apart, could not
 
turn simultaneously 16 points inwards could not countermarch
 
inwards without cutting one another's courses at some point.
 
If the two ships turned at exactly the same moment, at equal
 
speeds, and on similar parabolas, they would collide. But, even if
 
1 FitzGerald ; 368, 387-390.
 
2 The tactical diameter of the Victoria herself was only 600 yards; but that of
 
some ships was much more. The accepted tactical diameter for the squadron was
 
800 yards (4 cables) (FitzGerald, 392).
 
422 MILITARY HISTOHY OF THE ROYAL NAVY, 1857-1900.
 
the distance between the columns had been, as it was suggested
 
it should be, eight cables, or 1600 yards, instead of 1200 yards
 
there would still have been risk of ultimate collision, had the
 
manoeuvre been carried out on the lines on which it was attempted ;
 
for the ships, upon completing the turn, would have been, if not
 
actually on board of one another, at least so close alongside one
 
another as to be in dangerous proximity. We know that Tryon,
 
after having originally suggested six cables, assented to the distance
 
between the columns being eight cables, and that finally, nevertheless,
 
he ordered the distance to be six cables, in spite of the fact that
 
his attention was called pointedly to the discrepancy. We know,
 
moreover, that eight cables was almost as dangerous a distance as
 
six cables, if the columns were to countermarch according to the
 
supposed plan. We know, too, that Tryon intended the columns
 
to come up to the assigned anchorage at a distance of two cables
 
asunder ; so that the most suitable distance apart of the columns
 
previous to the fatal manoeuvre (assuming what was attempted to
 
have been what was intended by the Vice-Admiral) would have been
 
not even eight cables, but ten (2000 yards).
 
There is, I think, but one conclusion to be drawn from all this ;
 
namely, that Tryon knew that, for the purposes of the manoeuvre
 
which he had in his mind not necessarily the manoeuvre which
 
was attempted it did not greatly matter whether the initial distance
 
between the columns was six cables or eight cables. If it had
 
greatly mattered, Tryon was the last man in the world to have
 
been careless on the subject, or to have run things too fine. 1
 
This conclusion seems to clear the way somewhat ; but before
 
I go on to point out what it appears to me to clear the way to,
 
I desire to dwell upon another admitted fact, a fact, however, which
 
has been strangely lost sight of.
 
The terms of the flag-signal to each division terminated with the
 
direction, "preserving the order of the fleet." Either that direction
 
meant literally and plainly that the order of the fleet in every
 
respect was to be preserved, or it was a direction which, in the
 
circumstances, demanded further elucidation. Tryon did not further
 
elucidate it ; wherefore it may be inferred that it was to be accepted
 
literally.
 
1 The arguments about to be put forth were first advanced by the Author iu a letter
 
to the Times soon after the catastrophe. He is not aware that they have ever been
 
adequately discussed, though they were cited long afterwards by the Saturday Review.
 
1893.] LOSS OF THE " VICTORIA." 423
 
What, then, was the order of the fleet? It was a disposition in
 
columns of divisions in line ahead, the columns disposed abeam to
 
port, with a distance of six cables between the columns. At the
 
head of the first or starboard divisional column was the Victoria,
 
followed by the Nile, etc. : at the head of the port or second
 
divisional column was the Camperdown, followed by the Edinbiirgh,
 
etc. The direction
 
"
 
preserving the order of the fleet
 
"
 
may I
 
believe, must have been intended by Tryon to mean that, after the
 
completion of the manoeuvre, the Victoria was still to head the
 
starboard, and the Camperdown still to head the port column, and
 
that the ships following each of the leaders were to follow in the
 
same sequence and manner as before the inception of the manoeuvre.
 
It is difficult to perceive what other meaning can be attached to it,
 
in view of the nature of the signals of which it formed part.
 

Revision as of 15:29, 2 March 2010

Captain Brackenbury wrote to Admiral Sir Geoffrey Hornby on 23 June that he believed Markham to be "absolutely blameless".[1] He later wrote to his wife that "the fault was entirely the commander-in-chief's as we were all obeying his orders.[2]

Markham later wrote to Noel, "I cannot permit your sneer at the ability of Captain Johnstone to pass unchallenged … I have the greatest confidence in his skill and ability to handle his ship and the utmost faith in his prudence and loyalty."[3]

On 13 August Custance wrote to Noel, "Colomb's letter was most unfortunate and I am extremely sorry that it should have been written. The view which he wished to put forward might very well have been stated without making it appear as a personal attack on Sir G Tryon … It will make no end of bad blood."[4]

Footnotes

  1. Letter of 23 June, 1893. National Maritime Museum. Hornby Papers. PHI/120D.Quoted in Gordon. Rules of the Game. p. 653.
  2. National Maritime Museum. Brackenbury Papers. BCK/13/15B. Quoted in Gordon. Rules of the Game. p. 653.
  3. National Maritime Museum. Noel Papers. NOE/1A. Quoted in Gordon. Rules of the Game. p. 654.
  4. Letter of 13 August, 1893. Quoted in Gordon. Rules of the Game. p. 655.

Bibliography