Difference between revisions of "Pacific Station (Royal Navy)"

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Algernon Charles Fieschi Heneage|nick=Algernon C. F. Heneage|appt=20 September, 1887{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}}}
 
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Algernon Charles Fieschi Heneage|nick=Algernon C. F. Heneage|appt=20 September, 1887{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}}}
 
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Charles Frederick Hotham|nick=Charles F. Hotham|appt=4 February, 1890{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}|ass=7 June, 1890{{NLApr91|p. 191}}}}
 
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Charles Frederick Hotham|nick=Charles F. Hotham|appt=4 February, 1890{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}|ass=7 June, 1890{{NLApr91|p. 191}}}}
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Henry Frederick Stephenson|nick=Henry F. Stephenson|appt=4 May, 1893{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}}}
+
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Henry Frederick Stephenson|nick=Henry F. Stephenson|appt=21 March, 1893<ref>Stephenson Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/36/1134.|}} f. 1235.</ref>|ass=4 May, 1893<ref>Stephenson Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/36/1134.|}} f. 1235.</ref>|end=5 September, 1896<ref>Stephenson Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/36/1134.|}} f. 1235.</ref>}}
 
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Henry St. Leger Bury Palliser|nick=Henry St. L. Bury Palliser|appt=5 March, 1896|ass=19 June, 1896{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}|end=15 August, 1899}}
 
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Henry St. Leger Bury Palliser|nick=Henry St. L. Bury Palliser|appt=5 March, 1896|ass=19 June, 1896{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}|end=15 August, 1899}}
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Lewis Anthony Beaumont|nick=Lewis A. Beaumont|appt=22 June, 1899{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}|ass=15 August, 1899|end=}}
+
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Lewis Anthony Beaumont|nick=Lewis A. Beaumont|appt=20 March, 1899<ref>Beaumont Service Record. {{TNA|ADM 196/36/226.|}} f. 88.</ref>|ass=22 June, 1899{{ClowesVII|p. 88}}<ref>Beaumont Service Record. {{TNA|ADM 196/36/226.|}} f. 88.</ref>|end=1 November, 1900<ref>Beaumont Service Record. {{TNA|ADM 196/36/226.|}} f. 88.</ref>}}
 
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Andrew Kennedy Bickford|nick=Andrew K. Bickford|appt=15 October, 1900<ref>Bickford Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/36.}}  f. 100.</ref>|ass=13 December, 1900|end=21 December, 1903<ref>Bickford Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/36.}}  f. 100.</ref>}}
 
{{Tenure|rank=Rear-Admiral|name=Andrew Kennedy Bickford|nick=Andrew K. Bickford|appt=15 October, 1900<ref>Bickford Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/36.}}  f. 100.</ref>|ass=13 December, 1900|end=21 December, 1903<ref>Bickford Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/36.}}  f. 100.</ref>}}
 
{{Tenure|rank={{Com2RN}}|name=James Edward Clifford Goodrich|nick=James E. C. Goodrich|appt=15 October, 1903<ref>Goodrich Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/38.}}  f. 535.</ref>|ass=21 December, 1903<ref>Goodrich Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/38.}}  f. 535.</ref>|end=1 March, 1905<ref>Goodrich Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/38.}}  f. 535.  Date was an approximate forecast.</ref>}}
 
{{Tenure|rank={{Com2RN}}|name=James Edward Clifford Goodrich|nick=James E. C. Goodrich|appt=15 October, 1903<ref>Goodrich Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/38.}}  f. 535.</ref>|ass=21 December, 1903<ref>Goodrich Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/38.}}  f. 535.</ref>|end=1 March, 1905<ref>Goodrich Service Record.  {{TNA|ADM 196/38.}}  f. 535.  Date was an approximate forecast.</ref>}}

Latest revision as of 12:24, 2 August 2021

In September, 1901, Andrew Bickford referred in a letter to the Admiralty to "the dangerously weak state of the Squadron."[1] He also requested improvements in the garrison at Esquimalt, an increase of destroyers to defend the coaling station at Nainamo and a significant increase in the squadron to act as a deterrent. The Director of Naval Intelligence, Reginald N. Custance commented, "this letter shows, when considered in connection with the calls upon us of other stations, how impossible it is to think of attempting to meet the U.S. on equal terms on the Pacific coast of North America."[2]

In November, 1902, the Admiralty announced that it had decided to abolish the Liffey, Staff Commander J. D. Moulton, as storeship at Coquimbo, Chile as it had been decided that a storeship in the south of the Pacific Station was no longer needed. The Liffey was directed to be sold.[3]

Commanders-in-Chief

Dates of appointment given:

Composition

September, 1885:[18]

June, 1890:[19]

February, 1896:[20]

Footnotes

  1. Letter of 17 September, 1901. Quoted in Bourne. Britain and the Balance of Power in America. p. 375.
  2. Bourne. Britain and the Balance of Power in America. pp. 375-376.
  3. "Naval & Military Intelligence" (Official Appointments and Notices). The Times. Thursday, 20 November, 1902. Issue 36930, col D, p. 10.
  4. The Navy List. (January, 1880). p. 188.
  5. Clowes. The Royal Navy. Vol. VII. p. 87.
  6. Clowes. The Royal Navy. Vol. VII. p. 88.
  7. Clowes. The Royal Navy. Vol. VII. p. 88.
  8. Clowes. The Royal Navy. Vol. VII. p. 88.
  9. Clowes. The Royal Navy. Vol. VII. p. 88.
  10. Stephenson Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/36/1134. f. 1235.
  11. Stephenson Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/36/1134. f. 1235.
  12. Beaumont Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/36/226. f. 88.
  13. Beaumont Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/36/226. f. 88.
  14. Bickford Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/36. f. 100.
  15. Bickford Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/36. f. 100.
  16. Goodrich Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/38. f. 535.
  17. Goodrich Service Record. The National Archives. ADM 196/38. f. 535. Date was an approximate forecast.
  18. The Navy List. (October, 1885). p. 189.
  19. The Navy List. (July, 1890). p. 189.
  20. The Navy List. (March, 1896). p. 193.

Bibliography

See Also