Difference between revisions of "British Adoption of Director Firing"
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Directors of various forms had been tried for over twenty years, but the type used in the war traced its lineage to that proposed by [[Percy Scott]] in 1905.<ref name=brooks>{{BibBrooksDreadnoughtGunnery}}, p. 48.</ref> [[H.M.S. Africa (1905)|''H.M.S. Africa'']] conducted the first tests of an elevation-only director in 1907<ref name=ukfc>{{BibUKFireControlInHMShips1919}}, p. 4.</ref>, and a variant from Bacon was tested in ''Dreadnought'' and ''Bellerophon''. | Directors of various forms had been tried for over twenty years, but the type used in the war traced its lineage to that proposed by [[Percy Scott]] in 1905.<ref name=brooks>{{BibBrooksDreadnoughtGunnery}}, p. 48.</ref> [[H.M.S. Africa (1905)|''H.M.S. Africa'']] conducted the first tests of an elevation-only director in 1907<ref name=ukfc>{{BibUKFireControlInHMShips1919}}, p. 4.</ref>, and a variant from Bacon was tested in ''Dreadnought'' and ''Bellerophon''. | ||
| − | Successes in the 1909 Battle Practice and thereafter | + | Successes in the 1909 Battle Practice and thereafter fostered support for the concept, culminating in successful trials in May 1910 aboard ''Bellerophon''. The system was not without faults, however. It was still elevation-only and the need to fire on the roll apparently resulted in a low rate of fire. ''Bellerophon'''s commander, Hugh Evan-Thomas, reported, "In view therefore of the slowness of the system and the doubtfulness of the advantages to be gained by it, the system of Director Firing is not recommended for adoption in HM [His Majesty's] Service."<ref>John Brooks. "Percy Scott and the Director". p. 159.</ref>. |
==Trials in H.M.S. ''Neptune''== | ==Trials in H.M.S. ''Neptune''== | ||
| − | + | A final change to make the system work in elevation as well as training was tried aboard [[H.M.S. Neptune (1909)|''Neptune'']]. By early 1911, confidence was sufficient that the ''Orion''- and ''Lion''-classes were to be completed with the extensive wiring required for the directors, but a further generation of refinement was to be tried in [[H.M.S. Thunderer (1911)|''Thunderer'']] to address issues of reliability and accuracy in the ''Neptune'' design. | |
==Trials in H.M.S. ''Thunderer''== | ==Trials in H.M.S. ''Thunderer''== | ||
| − | + | [[H.M.S. Thunderer (1911)|''Thunderer'']]'s refined system was subjected to a competitive shoot-out against [[H.M.S. Orion (1910)|''Orion'']] in November 1912 which finally clearly demonstrated the advantages and utility of director firing. | |
| − | The acceptance of the | + | The acceptance of the ''Thunderer'' prototype in 1913 pushed the Royal Navy to the point it was ready to deploy the equipment in new construction and to retrofit its existing fleet. |
==Early Orders== | ==Early Orders== | ||
| − | At the outset of the program of equipping the fleet, a large number of suitable platforms for retrofit were on hand, and they were handled in sets as finances, dock time and equipment availability permitted. Vickers was to perform most of the work of manufacture and installation. | + | At the outset of the program of equipping the fleet, a large number of suitable platforms for retrofit were on hand, and they were handled in sets as finances, dock time and equipment availability permitted. [[Vickers]] was to perform most of the work of manufacture and installation. |
The "Twelve Ship Order" was to replace the prototype director in ''Thunderer'' with production gear, and to provide sets also for [[H.M.S. Monarch (1911)|''Monarch'']], [[H.M.S. Benbow (1913)|''Benbow'']], [[H.M.S. Emperor of India (1913)|''Emperor of India'']], [[H.M.S. Marlborough (1912)|''Marlborough'']], [[H.M.S. Iron Duke (1912)|''Iron Duke'']], [[H.M.S. King George V (1911)|''King George V'']], [[H.M.S. Ajax (1912)|''Ajax'']] (which received the first production set), [[H.M.S. Centurion (1911)|''Centurion'']], [[H.M.S. Audacious (1912)|''Audacious'']], [[H.M.S. Queen Mary (1912)|''Queen Mary'']] and [[H.M.S. Tiger (1913)|''Tiger'']]. | The "Twelve Ship Order" was to replace the prototype director in ''Thunderer'' with production gear, and to provide sets also for [[H.M.S. Monarch (1911)|''Monarch'']], [[H.M.S. Benbow (1913)|''Benbow'']], [[H.M.S. Emperor of India (1913)|''Emperor of India'']], [[H.M.S. Marlborough (1912)|''Marlborough'']], [[H.M.S. Iron Duke (1912)|''Iron Duke'']], [[H.M.S. King George V (1911)|''King George V'']], [[H.M.S. Ajax (1912)|''Ajax'']] (which received the first production set), [[H.M.S. Centurion (1911)|''Centurion'']], [[H.M.S. Audacious (1912)|''Audacious'']], [[H.M.S. Queen Mary (1912)|''Queen Mary'']] and [[H.M.S. Tiger (1913)|''Tiger'']]. | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 3 December 2010
The Royal Navy's adoption of the director occurred in a blizzard of activity immediately prior to the war and throughout its duration. Priority was placed on the ships with the largest guns and those most likely to see front-line service in the face of the enemy: dreadnoughts, battle cruisers and monitors.
Early Trials in H.M.S. Africa
Directors of various forms had been tried for over twenty years, but the type used in the war traced its lineage to that proposed by Percy Scott in 1905.[1] H.M.S. Africa conducted the first tests of an elevation-only director in 1907[2], and a variant from Bacon was tested in Dreadnought and Bellerophon.
Successes in the 1909 Battle Practice and thereafter fostered support for the concept, culminating in successful trials in May 1910 aboard Bellerophon. The system was not without faults, however. It was still elevation-only and the need to fire on the roll apparently resulted in a low rate of fire. Bellerophon's commander, Hugh Evan-Thomas, reported, "In view therefore of the slowness of the system and the doubtfulness of the advantages to be gained by it, the system of Director Firing is not recommended for adoption in HM [His Majesty's] Service."[3].
Trials in H.M.S. Neptune
A final change to make the system work in elevation as well as training was tried aboard Neptune. By early 1911, confidence was sufficient that the Orion- and Lion-classes were to be completed with the extensive wiring required for the directors, but a further generation of refinement was to be tried in Thunderer to address issues of reliability and accuracy in the Neptune design.
Trials in H.M.S. Thunderer
Thunderer's refined system was subjected to a competitive shoot-out against Orion in November 1912 which finally clearly demonstrated the advantages and utility of director firing.
The acceptance of the Thunderer prototype in 1913 pushed the Royal Navy to the point it was ready to deploy the equipment in new construction and to retrofit its existing fleet.
Early Orders
At the outset of the program of equipping the fleet, a large number of suitable platforms for retrofit were on hand, and they were handled in sets as finances, dock time and equipment availability permitted. Vickers was to perform most of the work of manufacture and installation.
The "Twelve Ship Order" was to replace the prototype director in Thunderer with production gear, and to provide sets also for Monarch, Benbow, Emperor of India, Marlborough, Iron Duke, King George V, Ajax (which received the first production set), Centurion, Audacious, Queen Mary and Tiger.
The successive "Seventeen Ship Order" covered Orion, Colossus, Hercules, Neptune, St. Vincent, Collingwood, Bellerophon, Superb, Temeraire, Dreadnought, Lion, Princess Royal, Indefatigable, New Zealand, Invincible, Indomitable and Inflexible.
The combined result of these orders and the trial installations was that 8 dreadnoughts were equipped with director firing for their main battery: Neptune possibly still with her prototype gear from 1911, Thunderer with her director from 1912 possibly updated, Ajax from 1913, and Iron Duke, Marlborough, King George V, Centurion and Monarch from earlier in 1914.[2]
See Also
Footnotes
- ↑ Template:BibBrooksDreadnoughtGunnery, p. 48.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Template:BibUKFireControlInHMShips1919, p. 4. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "ukfc" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ John Brooks. "Percy Scott and the Director". p. 159.
Bibliography
