View source for British Adoption of Director Firing

From The Dreadnought Project

← British Adoption of Director Firing

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

• The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, editor.
• You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

---

You can view and copy the source of this page.

The Royal Navy's adoption of the director occurred in a blizzard of activity immediately prior to the war and throughout its duration. Priority was placed on the ships with the largest guns and those most likely to see front-line service in the face of the enemy: dreadnoughts, battle cruisers and monitors. ==Prehistory== The earliest use of the word "director" in the Royal Navy appears to be tied to a firing circuit only, with one trigger firing more than just its single weapon, those other weapons involved firing at a fixed elevation as the sights rolled on. There is no mention of angles being transmitted. In the ''Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1881'' there is mention of electrical firing of a broadside by a "directing gun", a concept approved in late 1880 and for which suitable a firing pistol was being sought.{{ARTS1881|pp. 19, 61. Plate X}} The ''Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1890'' has several pages and diagrams on these systems.{{ARTS1890|pp. 91-93, Plates 16 and 18}} The ''Annual Report of the Torpedo School, 1891'' bemourned a multiplicity of different director schemes burgeoning in the fleet, illustrating the status quo as follows:{{ARTS1891|pp. 123-4}} '''Battleships''' * [[Admiral Class Battleship (1882)|Admiral]] and [[Trafalgar Class Battleship (1887)|''Trafalgar'' class]] battleships had directors "on the new plan". * {{UK-Victoria}} and {{UK-SansPareil}} had directors for their 6-in guns only. * turret-ram [[H.M.S. Hotspur (1870)|''Hotspur'']] had a director circuit of "old pattern". * {{UK-1Dreadnought}}, {{UK-2Neptune}}, {{UK-1Agamemnon}}, {{UK-1Inflexible}}, {{UK-1Colossus}} and {{UK-Edinburgh}} had director circuits "on an old plan". * {{UK-1Thunderer}}, {{UK-Devastation}}, {{UK-2Ajax}} and new battleships had no directors. '''Cruisers''' * [[Mersey Class Cruiser (1885)|''Mersey'' class]] director for 8-in guns. * "Belted cruisers" had 6-in gun directors. * {{UK-Imperieuse}} and {{UK-1Warspite}} had directors for 6-in guns and 9.2-in broadside guns only. * [[Blake Class Cruiser (1889)|''Blake'']] and [[Edgar Class Cruiser (1890)|''Edgar'' class]] cruisers had none. It was further proposed that:{{ARTS1891|p. 124}} * the [[Mersey Class Cruiser (1885)|''Mersey'' class]] have their 8-in guns removed from their circuit. * {{UK-1Centurion}} and {{UK-Barfleur}} not have directors installed. * {{UK-1Dreadnought}}, {{UK-2Neptune}}, {{UK-1Agamemnon}}, {{UK-1Inflexible}}, {{UK-1Colossus}}, {{UK-Edinburgh}}, [[H.M.S. Hotspur (1870)|''Hotspur'']], {{UK-1Glatton}}, ''Cyclops'', ''Hecate'', ''Gorgon'', ''Wivern'' have their systems removed upon their next refit. * all other ships remain as fitted. * a report on the "new plan" systems be called for on 30 December 1892. ==1907 Trials in H.M.S. ''Africa''== Directors of various forms had been tried for over twenty years, but the type used in the war traced its lineage to that proposed by [[Percy Moreton Scott, First Baronet|Percy Scott]] in 1905.{{BrooksDGBJ|p. 48}} {{UK-Africa|f=p}} conducted the first tests of an elevation-only director in 1907.{{FCHMShips|p. 4}} ==1910 Trials in ''Dreadnought'' and ''Bellerophon''== [[Reginald Hugh Spencer Bacon|Reginald Bacon]] oversaw the testing of a variant in {{UK-Dreadnought}}. Successes in the 1909 Battle Practice and thereafter fostered support for the concept, culminating in successful trials in May 1910 aboard {{UK-Bellerophon}}. The system was not without faults, however. It was still elevation-only and the need to fire on the roll resulted in a rate of fire sufficiently low to inspire criticism. ''Bellerophon'''s commander, [[Hugh Evan-Thomas]], reported, "In view therefore of the slowness of the system and the doubtfulness of the advantages to be gained by it, the system of Director Firing is not recommended for adoption in HM [His Majesty's] Service."<ref>John Brooks. "Percy Scott and the Director". p. 159.</ref>. ==Trials in H.M.S. ''Neptune''== A final change to make the system work in elevation as well as training was tried aboard {{UK-1Neptune}}. By early 1911, confidence was sufficient that the ''Orion''- and ''Lion''-classes were to be completed with the extensive wiring required for the directors, but a further generation of refinement was to be tried in {{UK-Thunderer}} to address issues of reliability and accuracy in the ''Neptune'' design. ==Trials in H.M.S. ''Thunderer''== {{UK-Thunderer}}'s refined system was subjected to a competitive shoot-out against {{UK-Orion}} in November 1912 which finally clearly demonstrated the advantages and utility of director firing. The acceptance of the ''Thunderer'' prototype in 1913 pushed the Royal Navy to the point it was ready to deploy the equipment in new construction and to retrofit its existing fleet. ==Early Orders== At the outset of the program of equipping the fleet, a large number of suitable platforms for retrofit were on hand, and they were handled in sets as finances, dock time and equipment availability permitted. [[Vickers]] was to perform most of the work of manufacture and installation. The "Twelve Ship Order" was to replace the prototype director in ''Thunderer'' with production gear, and to provide sets also for {{UK-Monarch}}, {{UK-Benbow}}, {{UK-EmperorOfIndia}}, {{UK-Marlborough}}, {{UK-IronDuke}}, {{UK-KingGeorgeV}}, {{UK-1Ajax}} (which received the first production set), {{UK-Centurion}}, {{UK-Audacious}}, {{UK-QueenMary}} and {{UK-Tiger}}. The successive "Seventeen Ship Order" covered {{UK-Orion}}, {{UK-Colossus}}, {{UK-Hercules}}, {{UK-1Neptune}}, {{UK-StVincent}}, {{UK-Collingwood}}, {{UK-Bellerophon}}, {{UK-Superb}}, [[H.M.S._Temeraire_(1907)|''Temeraire'']], [[H.M.S._Dreadnought_(1906)|''Dreadnought'']], {{UK-Lion}}, {{UK-PrincessRoyal}}, {{UK-Indefatigable}}, {{UK-NewZealand}}, {{UK-Invincible}}, {{UK-Indomitable}} and {{UK-Inflexible}}. The combined result of these orders and the trial installations was that when the war started, 8 dreadnoughts were equipped with director firing for their main battery: ''Neptune'' possibly still with her prototype gear from 1911, ''Thunderer'' with her director from 1912 possibly updated, ''Ajax'' from 1913, and ''Iron Duke'', ''Marlborough'', ''King George V'', ''Centurion'' and ''Monarch'' from earlier in 1914.{{UKTH23|pp. 4, 9-10}} In early 1913 Sir Percy Scott had informed the [[First Lord of the Admiralty]], {{WSC}}, that, "With a big effort we could have 12 of our Dreadnoughts fitted by the Autumn."<ref>Scott to Churchill. Letter of 5 January, 1913. Churchill Papers. Churchill Archives Centre. CHAR 13/19/1.</ref> This offer was clearly declined. ==Proliferation== Once the director design was finalised, all successive dreadnoughts, battlecruisers and big-gun monitors were completed with an installation for the main battery. However, the number of unequipped vessels of these types were still considerable and beyond them, there were light cruisers and destroyers awaiting similar if less elaborate facilities, and secondary batteries of large vessels as well. Priorities were established. Despite the overarching need to preserve wartime readiness of the fleet, the installed base of directors grew rapidly as refit opportunities permitted. :{|border=1 !align=center colspan=7|Director Installations for Main/Secondary Armament{{UKProgressInNavalGunnery1914-1918|p. 37}} |- !align=center| !align=center|Battleships !align=center|Battlecruisers !align=center|Cruisers !align=center|Light Cruisers !align=center|Monitors !align=center|Leaders &<br>Destroyers |- |align=center|1911 |align=center|1 |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |- |align=center|1912 |align=center|1 |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |- |align=center|1913 |align=center|1 |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |- |align=center|1914 |align=center|8 |align=center|1 |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |- |align=center|1915 |align=center|8 |align=center|4 |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|14 |align=center|&ndash; |- |align=center|1916 |align=center|14 |align=center|5/2 |align=center|2/2 |align=center|2 |align=center|2 |align=center|&ndash; |- |align=center|1917 |align=center|1/15 |align=center|&ndash;/1 |align=center|1/1 |align=center|18 |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|&ndash; |- |align=center|1918 |align=center|&ndash;/3<ref name=sep1918>By 1st September, 1918.</ref> |align=center|&ndash; |align=center|2 |align=center|25 |align=center|5 |align=center|118<ref name=sep1918/> |- |align=center|'''Total''' |align=center|31/18 |align=center|11/3 |align=center|5/3 |align=center|45 |align=center|21 |align=center|118 |} ==See Also== *[[British Director Firing Systems]] *[[Henderson Firing Gear]] ==Footnotes== {{reflist}} ==Bibliography== {{refbegin}} *{{FCHMShips}} *{{BrooksDGBJ}} *Brooks, John (1997). "Percy Scott and the Director". ''Warship 1996'': pp. 150–170. * ''Director Firing Gear: Transfer from Dreadnought to Bellerophon'', 1910 at {{TNA|ADM 1/8145}} {{refend}} [[Category:Fire Control]]

Return to British Adoption of Director Firing.